Make your own free website on

usofa,uk snakes
Home | How low can you go. . . | Cure for Snakebite | "Grandfathering in" the two-headed snake | "gilligan's island" | zionist SNAKE | TRUTH will drive the two-headed SNAKE out | Fallujah Flushes Two-Headed Snake | Spanish SNAKE slithers | French SNAKES | dubya,"bliar" resign | Grandfather Snake | Driving the SNAKES out . . . | rumdum(b) AGAIN | Gross sexual imposition | Gross Malfeasance in Office | Bay of Pigs | "sexing up the dossier" | better than they are | frickandfrack | mass murderer | "naked aggession" | two-headed snake | the people vs. VIPERS | the people vs VIPERS page two
"sexing up the dossier"

GOODBYE tony blair
lies lies and more lies -- face of a mass murderer

The whistleblower

Richard Norton-Taylor and Vikram Dodd
Thursday September 4, 2003
The Guardian

A senior government intelligence official who was deeply involved in the production of the dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction yesterday accused the government of "over-egging" the threat posed by Saddam Hussein and of ignoring concerns about central claims made in the document.

Brian Jones, a top analyst in the defence intelligence staff, described how the "shutters came down", preventing experts on chemical and biological weapons from expressing widespread disquiet about the language and assumptions in the dossier.

He told the Hutton inquiry that he and fellow intelligence officials regarded as "nebulous" the hotly disputed claim that Iraqi forces could deploy chemical and biological weapons within 45 minutes - the assertion at the centre of the row between Downing Street and the BBC.

The claim, he said, came from a single but "secondary" source whose purpose might have been to "influence rather than inform" British intelligence agencies.

Dr Jones, who is now retired, was at the time the dossier was published the head of a scientific section in the defence intelligence analysis staff responsible for chemical and biological weapons.

Pressed by Lord Hutton to explain his worries, he told the inquiry: "My concerns were that Iraq's chemical weapons and biological weapons capabilities were not being accurately represented in all regards in relation to the available evidence. "In particular ... on the advice of my staff, I was told that there was no evidence that significant production had taken place either of chemical warfare agent or chemical weapons."

Some intelligence analysts complained that they were unhappy with "all the detail that was in the dossier", he said.

Dr Jones went as far as to suggest that Iraq possessed few, if any, weapons of mass destruction in the proper meaning of the term. He said he would struggle to place chemical weapons, and many biological weapons, in the category of "weapons of mass destruction", he added.

He described how his top chemical warfare expert had expressed concern about the tendency "to over-egg certain assessments in relation particularly to the production of CW [chemical warfare] agents and weapons since 1998". He "could not point to any solid evidence of such production".

Dr Jones chaired a meeting of senior defence intelligence officials on September 19, five days before the dossier was published. David Kelly, the government's expert on Iraq's banned weapons programme whose suicide led to the Hutton inquiry, was present.